MLH1 and MSH2 gene mutation patterns in Lynch
syndrome-associated colorectal cancer in Sudan
Balgis Elhag Ibrahim Tager1,
Salah Eldin G. Elzaki,
and Ahmed Abdula Agabeldour 3
1Histopathology and
Cytology Department, Faculty of Medical Laboratory Sciences, West Kordofan
University, Elnuhood,
Sudan. Department of molecular epidemiology, Tropical Medicine Research
Institute, National Centre for Research Khartoum Sudan. Department of
Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, Kordofan University, El-Obeid, Sudan.
Abstract
Background: Colorectal
cancer (CRC) is increasingly becoming dominant in Sudan, which is attributed to
several factors, including hereditary mutations in the DNA mismatch repair
genes MLH1 and MSH2. Therefore, this study aimed to examine the MLH1 and MSH2
gene mutation patterns in Lynch syndrome-associated colorectal cancer in a
series of Sudanese patients with CRC. Methodology: This study
investigated 50 patients with CRC who attended El-Obeid Hospital during the
period from 2017 to 2022. The presence of MLH1 and MSH2 was indicated by
immunohistochemical testing of formalin-fixed, paraffin-wax-embedded
tissues. Results: The MLH1 mutation was positive in 28% of the
study population and negative in 72% of them. The MSH2 mutation was positive in
42% and negative in 58% of the study subjects. The MLH1 and MSH2 mutations
shared positivity in 18% and negativity in 24% of the cases. Conclusion: According
to the present studies, CRC is more prevalent in women. LS is more common in
Sudanese patients with CRC than in many other reports throughout the world.
MSH2 mutations are more prevalent in Sudanese patients than MLH1 mutations.
Keywords: colorectal cancer, Lynch syndrome, MLH1, MSH2, Sudan.
Correspondence
to: Balgis Elhag Ibrahim Tager,
Email: bintelhag@yahoo.com
Cite this article: Tager BEI, Elzaki SEG, and Agabeldour AA. MLH1 and MSH2 gene mutation patterns in Lynch
syndrome-associated colorectal cancer in Sudan. Medical
Research Updates Journal
2024;2(1): 25-28. DOI: https//doi.org/10.70084/pmrcc.mruj2.12
Introduction
Lynch syndrome (LS), formerly known as hereditary
non-polyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC), is an autosomal dominant illness
characterized by mutations in the DNA mismatch repair genes MLH1, MSH2, MSH6,
and PMS2. LS predisposes to a wide range of malignancies, the most common of
which are colorectal tumors. The key risk factors for LS include gender, age,
and the genes implicated [1]. Autoimmunity and immunodeficiency aid in the
development of malignancies in LS [2]. More than 90% of CRC cases are adenocarcinomas
in glandular epithelial cells of the large intestine (colon and rectum), with
the remaining 5% being hereditary nonpolyposis CRC (HNPCC) or familial
adenomatous polyposis (FAP) caused by APC, MLH1, and MSH2 mutations [3, 4]. DNA
mismatch repair (MMR) gene homozygous and heterozygous germline mutations are
the cause of Lynch syndrome. MSH2 accounts for about 40–50%, MLH1 (30–37%), and
MSH6 mutations are detected in 7–13% and up to 9 percent of PMS2 cases.
Patients with LS have a lifetime chance of acquiring colorectal cancer of
50–80% [5]. Mismatch repair (MMR) proteins (MLH1, PMS2, MSH2, and MSH6) are the
major DNA repair system that repair mismatches and small insertions and
deletions that occur during cellular replication; their deficiency (MMR-D) affects
microsatellites and causes alterations known as microsatellite instability
(MSI), as well as loss of MMR protein expression in tumors. CRC is generally
sporadic, with approximately 5% to 10% being hereditary colon cancer syndromes,
which include Lynch syndrome, adenomatous polyposis syndromes, and hamartomatous polyposis syndromes. [6]. Colorectal cancer
(CRC) is one of the most frequent malignancies globally; approximately 20–30%
of CRCs are familial, and LS is the most common form of hereditary CRC caused
by germline mismatch repair (MMR) gene mutations (MLH1, MSH2, MSH6, or PMS2)
[5]. However, there is a scarcity of data from Sudan on colorectal cancer
epidemiology. As a result, the purpose of this study was to look at the MLH1
and MSH2 gene mutation patterns in Lynch syndrome-associated colorectal cancer
in a series of Sudanese patients with CRC.
Materials and methods
This study used 50 tissue blocks obtained from
histopathology facilities in El-Obeid, Norther Kordofan State. Formalin-fixed
wax-embedded tissue blocks were acquired from CRC patients who had surgical
resections. All of the tissues were formalin-fixed and wax-embedded. The sample
consisted of all CRC patients revealed to histopathology laboratories in
El-Obeid between 2017 and 2022. For the purpose of diagnosis, conventional
histology was used to make the main diagnosis of CRC. In each case, a consultant
histopathologist confirmed the diagnosis of CRC. Following that,
immunohistochemistry methods were used to detect two MMR proteins (MLH1 and
MSH2). Immunohistochemical testing was carried out using two monoclonal
antibodies (MLH1: monoclonal mouse anti-human ki67, cloneMIB-1, and MSH2:
monoclonal mouse anti-human VEGF.) as follows: Two formalin-fixed,
paraffin-embedded tumor slices (3m) were cut and mounted on salinized slides
(Dako). Following xylene deparaffinization, slides were rehydrated in a graded series
of alcohol before being placed in running water. Then, using a PT connection,
antigen retrieval for MLH1 and MSH2 was performed. Endogenous peroxidase
activity was stopped for 10 minutes with 3% hydrogen peroxidase and methanol,
followed by 20 minutes at room temperature in a moisture chamber with 100–200 l
of primary antibodies, followed by a washing in phosphate buffered saline. The
MLH1 and MSH2 primary antibodies were ready for use (Dako, Carpintera). After three minutes
of washing with PBS, the Dako-EnVision TM Flex kit
incubated dextran-labeled polymer for 20 minutes to detect antibody binding.
Finally, the sections were washed three times in PBS before being stained with
3 diaminobenzidine tetra hydrochloride (DAB) (Dako) for up to 5 minutes to
produce the distinctive brown stain for the observation of the antibody/enzyme
combination. Hematoxylin was then used to stain the slides. Positive and
negative control slides are also generated for each staining session. The
positive control slides included the antigen under research, while the negative
control slides were made from the same tissue block but treated with PBS rather
than the primary antibody. An investigator evaluated each slide, and a
consultant histopathologist validated and rated the results.
Ethical Consent
Beside obtaining ethical acceptance from relevant
authorized bodies, The Human Research Ethics Committee (HREC) at the Prof.
Medical Research Consultancy Center has approved the research protocol. HREC
0001/MRCC.12/23).
Statistical analysis
After preparing the data on a standard master sheet, the
variables were entered into SPSS software for analysis. Percentages,
frequencies, and cross-tabulations were obtained.
Results
Of the 50 patients, 23 (46%) were males and 27 (54%)
were females, aged 20 to 75 years, with a mean age of 48. Most patients were
aged 41–60 years, followed by 61–75 and ≤ 40 years, representing 23/50 (46%),
11 (22%), and 8 (16%), respectively, as shown in Fig 1. The MLH1 mutation was
positive in 14 (28%) of the study population and negative in 36 (72% of them).
The MSH2 mutation was positive in 21 (42%), and negative in 29 (58%), of the
study subjects. The MLH1 and MSH2 mutations shared positivity in 9 (18%) and
negativity in 12 (24% of the cases), as seen in Fig 2.
Figure 1. Description of the study subjects by age and
mutation status.
Figure 2. Description of the study subjects by MLH1
and MSH2 mutation status
Discussion
LS is one of the most common hereditary cancer syndromes
in humans, affecting around 3% of colorectal cancer patients who are not
chosen, as well as 10%–15% of persons who have mismatch repair (MMR) genes,
including MLH1, MSH2, MSH6, and PMS2 [6, 7]. The reason we looked into MLH1 and
MSH2 mutations in a group of Sudanese patients with CRC was because pathogenic
germline variants in the MLH1, MSH2, and MSH6 genes are thought to cause most
LS cases [8]. MSH2 (42% of the mutations found in this study), MLH1 (28%), and
shared mutations in 24% of the subjects. Despite the fact that there is a
scarcity of data on the subject in Sudan, some studies have revealed lower
prevalence rates than ours. In a Sudanese study, immunohistochemistry was
employed to determine the BRAF (V600E) mutant status and mismatch repair (MMR)
status. A mismatch repair deficient (dMMR)
subtype was discovered in 16% of instances, and Lynch syndrome (LS) was
suspected in up to 14% of patients [9]. The family traditions in North Sudan
are well-known for the practice of consanguineous marriage. Certain Sudanese
ethnic groups are known to practice consanguinity and within-group marriage,
which are major contributors to the community's elevated burden of genetic
disease [10]. In the current investigation, we noticed that females were more
frequently affected by CRC than males. However, it has already been suggested
that patients with Lynch syndrome have a lifetime risk of colorectal cancer
(CRC) of 24-52%, which is higher in males (28–75%) than in females (24–72%).
There is a clear genotype-phenotype relationship, especially in the case of
MSH6 mutations. With an MSH6 mutation, men have a 54% lifetime risk, while
women have a 30% risk [11]. There is a significant association (p < 0.001)
between the MSH6 mutation and female gender and gynecological malignancies.
Male MSH2 and MLH1 carriers have higher rates of prostate, upper GI tract,
biliary, or pancreatic cancers compared to the general population, whereas
female carriers have higher rates of endometrial and ovarian malignancies [12].
In conclusion, according to the present studies, CRC is more prevalent in
women. LS is more common in Sudanese patients with CRC than in many other
reports throughout the world. MSH2 mutations are more prevalent in Sudanese
patients than MLH1 mutations.
Acknowledgment:
The authors would like to express their gratitude
to people at different histopathology laboratories in El-Obeid city for their
kind cooperation.
Authors contribution
BE: Conceptual,
consultation, funding, and approval of the final version.
SG: Conceptual,
data analysis, funding, and approval of the final version.
AAA: Conceptual, manuscript drafting,
and approval of the final version.
Funding: Self-funded.
Data availability: The data presented in this study are available on request to
the corresponding author.
Disclosure of interest: No interest to
declare.
References:
1- Galuppini F, Fassan M,
Mastracci L, et al. The histomorphological and molecular landscape of
colorectal adenomas and serrated lesions. Pathologica 2021; 113(3):218–229.
2- Cerretelli G, Ager A, Arends MJ, Frayling IM. Molecular pathology of Lynch
syndrome. Journal of Patholology 2020;
250(5):518–531.
3- Ahmad R, Singh J K, Wunnava A, Al-Obeed O, Abdulla M, and Srivastava KS. Emerging
trends in colorectal cancer: dysregulated signaling pathways (review)
International Journal of Molecular Medicine 2021; 47(3): 14.
4- Yamashita K, Fukushima H, Teramoto
M, Okita K, Ishikawa A, Sakurai A, Akagi K, and Nakase H. Interval between the
First Cancer and the Genetic Diagnosis in Lynch Syndrome Probands. Intern Med
2021;60(17):2719–2724.
5- Kim H, Lim KY, Park JW, et al. Sporadic and Lynch
syndrome-associated mismatch repair-deficient brain tumors. Lab Invest.
2022;102(2):160–171.
6- Peltomäki P, Nyström M, Mecklin JP, Seppälä
TT. Lynch syndrome genetics and clinical implications Gastroenterology.
2023;164(5):783–799. doi:
10.1053/j.gastro.2022.08.058.
7- Bolivar AM, Duzagac F,
Sinha KM, Vilar E. Advances in vaccine development for cancer prevention and
treatment in Lynch syndrome Mol Aspects Med. 2023;93:101204. doi: 10.1016/j.mam.2023.101204.
8- Sleiman J, Farha N, Beard J, Bena J, Morrison S, Milicia S, Heald B, Kalady MF, Church J, Liska D, Mankaney G, Burke CA.
Incidence and prevalence of advanced colorectal neoplasia in Lynch
syndrome. Gastrointest Endosc. 2023
Sep;98(3):412-419.e8. doi:
10.1016/j.gie.2023.04.001.
9- Elsayed I, Geraghty R, Mekki
SO, et al. Evaluating the utility and feasibility of mismatch repair testing
for colorectal cancer patients in a low- to middle-income country. Sci Rep.
2022 Jun 29;12(1):10998. doi:
10.1038/s41598-022-14644-6.
10- Hamad RS, Ibrahim ME. CMMRD is caused by the PMS1
mutation in a Sudanese consanguineous family. Hered Cancer Clin Pract 20, 16 (2022).
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13053-022-00222-4.
11- Schneider R, Schneider C, Jakobeit C, Fürst
A, Möslein G.
Gender-Specific Aspects of Lynch Syndrome and Familial Adenomatous
Polyposis. Viszeralmedizin.
2014 Apr;30(2):82-8. doi:
10.1159/000360839.
12- Cerrato C, Pandolfo SD, Autorino
R, Panunzio A, Tafuri A, Porcaro AB, Veccia A, De Marco V, Cerruto MA,
Antonelli A, Derweesh IH,
and Maresma MCM.
Gender-specific counseling for patients with upper tract urothelial carcinoma
and Lynch syndrome. World J. Urol. 2023 Jul;41(7):1741-1749. doi: 10.1007/s00345-023-04344-9.